Branding Mavericks

“How far should our brand stretch?

It's a question every brand manager must ask.

In our sluggish economy, businesses want to wring every dollar possible from their assets. One way to do that is by extending brands into new product lines.

For example, Starbucks extended their brand to liqueur and ice cream. The company makes money and consumers can enjoy products with authentic coffee taste. It is good.

But stretch a brand too far and it loses meaning -- and money.

The dangers to overextension are:
  1. the initial investment will not be recouped when the new product flops
  2. you'll tick off your most loyal customers who feel betrayed, thus giving competitors an opportunity to steal market share.
Coke pursued Pepsi youth with New Coke. We all know how well that went. And Virgin can mean a lot of things -- travel, music, telephony -- but apparently not cola. Bic tried pantyhose on for size. Didn't fit.

I live in San Francisco, 25 minutes north of a notorious surfing spot called Mavericks. Once every year or two, when the winter conditions are just right, the world's best big-wave riders are invited -- with only 24 hours notice -- to surf Mavericks' grotesquely giant waves.

The bigger they are, the harder they fall. A 50 foot wave falls hard.

It's a deadly contest. Literally.

Today, Mavericks has a small, dedicated following of surfers and others who are drawn to its danger and unpredictability. For them, Mavericks represents the ultimate confrontation of Man vs. Nature. Those who survive the mountainous waves have cheated death. And until proven otherwise, these gods-among-men are immortal.

At its core, the Mavericks brand means more than just a surf contest. That's why it has "permission" to extend to other categories -- up to a point.

Mavericks Surf Ventures recognizes the potential of their brand. To build visibility, Mavericks will sponsor a live reggae music tour. The intent is to build broader awareness before applying the brand to clothing and other sensible -- and lucrative -- product categories.

This week, the Half Moon Bay Review asked me if I thought Mavericks ought to be extended to live music tours. This is what I said:
“There’s a good long-term position (company executives) are tapping into for the recognition and awareness of Mavericks. ... They need to make sure the spirit of the Mavericks brand is reflected and held true within the context of that sponsorship,” Shore said.
So, yes, I do think it's a good idea to extend Mavericks into live music as long as the brand managers don't betray what the brand really means. A reggae tour is a natural fit. A Celine Dion tour is not.

Beyond music, Mavericks could move smoothly into clothing or sporting equipment. But some product categories, say...nursing homes or flatware, would make no sense.

Someday, Mavericks-branded products could compete directly against a surf brand like O'Neill, an adventure brand like North Face, and a human potential brand like the Olympics.

As long as the Mavericks brand managers don't get too maverick, they can look forward to a brand that will keep on giving.


  1. Why do you think that stretch has different elasticity in different cultures/regions. Korean and Japanese companies tend to expand pretty radically, but American companies don't. Is it a consumer/cultural thing? The way brands are built?

    Virgin is centered on an attitude, and between Red Bull, Pepsi and Bawls, that market is covered off on. But Kumho Asiana has tires, spas, luxury air travel without a problem.

    Also, is Mavericks Ale unlicenced then and just a "tribute" by Half Moon Bay Brewing? Or will they be serving it at reggae fest?

  2. Heady questions, Gucky.

    The origin and nature of the Asian brands has a lot to do with their breadth. The chaebol in Korea like Samsung, Hyundai and LG were government sanctioned (and perhaps partly owned) oligopolies. Three companies employed like 80% of the workers (wild guess), so everyone in the country depends on them for survival. So Hyundai can be a mall, financial services firm, insurer, car maker, computer mfr and people embrace it because, well, they have to. They don't have a lot of choice and these companies have looked out for them as employers and providers.

    In the US, the government has anti-trust laws that disallow this (or used to).

    No idea about the ale.

  3. Very interesting...we just talked about this topic in my brand management class at berkeley.

  4. The Mavericks brand will never truly be real since they ousted the founder and godfather of Mavericks, Jeff Clark. It is not pure, not authentic, but hype and a three ring circus. Surfers honor their own, and the "new" Mavericks isn't run by surfers, but by lawyers. To buy into the hype shows only how shallow your reearch is. It's an interesting concept, but they have failed the surf world and will never compete with ONiel or Quicksilver, run to true waterman and not by lying, staeling desk jockies.

  5. Anonymous (if that is your *real* name):

    There were surfers who once decried the practice of towing out to the really big waves at Mavericks. Some said it was a cop-out: Not really surfing. Today, it's accepted as the only practical way to ride the biggest waves.

    What's authentic and true -- ironically -- seems to evolve with the times.